You are here

Stopping Link Rot in Law and Science

Here's a more in-depth look at the site that "is creating etched-in-stone digital references for scholars and lawyers," GigaOm posted.

The Perma.cc site would solve the issue of broken links to the sources in scholarship by taking readers "to the Perma.cc site where they are presented with a page that has links both to the original web source (along with some information, including the date of the Perma.cc link’s creation) and to the archived version stored by Perma.cc," GigaOm also reports.

As GigaOm also noted, "link rot is a growing issue for both courts and academic journals, but one that is downplayed on the grounds that books and paper are the 'real' authorities while internet sources are ephemeral or, at best, unofficial. As the era of print recedes, however, this anti-digital bias looks more and more untenable."

My prior post on the findings that 50 percent of links in U.S. Supreme Court cases and 70 percent of links in some Harvard law journals are broken: http://www.cultivatedcompendium.com/news/link-rot-50-us-supreme-court-ca...