You are here

NM Supreme Court Justice Retains Seat Despite Same-Sex Marriage Ruling

New Mexico Supreme Court Justice Edward Chavez kept his seat on the bench despite his ruling in 2013 clearing the way from same-sex marriage, The New Mexican's Phaedra Haywood reports: "Despite being singled out by the New Mexico Center for Family Policy, NM Watchman Jose Vasquez, For God’s Glory Alone Ministries and political blogger Politix Fireball — all of whom advised voters not to retain Chavez because he had co-authored the landmark decision — Chavez easily received the necessary 57 percent of the vote to keep him on the bench — as did all the statewide judicial officeholders."  In contrast, when the Iowa Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage five years ago, voters ousted three of the justices when they faced a retention election.

TN Changes Judicial Selection Process

Tennessee voters opted to change the way that judges are selected, The Tennessean's Dave Boucher reports. The constitutional amendment tweaks the state's judicial selection process from one in which the governor appoints judges to one in which judges, after appointment by the governor, must be approved by legislators and face judicial retention vote from the general public vote every eight years.

Control of the Tennessee appellate courts has been heated this year. Three Democratic justices on the Tennessee Supreme Court were retained in the most expensive judicial campaign in the state's history. Republican Senate Speaker Ron Ramsey funded much of the effort to oust the justices. According to the AP, Ramsey promised to push for popular elections for judges if the constitutional amendment failed.

Ca Voters Reject Raising Medical Malpractice Damages Cap

A California ballot initiative to raise the cap on medical malpractice damages for pain and suffering was defeated, the Associated Press' Michael R. Blood reports. The battle over the initiative resulted in $60 million in donations and was the most expensive campaign in the state. If enacted, it would have raised the cap from $250,000 to $1.1 million.

The initiative also attracted national attention because it would have imposed random substance abuse tests on doctors.

Alabama Amendment Banning Foreign Law Passes

Alabama voters passed an amendment barring judges from using foreign law when "doing so would violate any state law or a right guaranteed by the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” Eugene Volokh blogs that the amendment is not really banning foreign law. Alabama judges can use foreign law in "tort cases arising from injuries in foreign countries, determining the family status of people who were married or adopted children in foreign countries, and more," as well as applying religious law, such as Sharia, when applying the foreign law of a country that incorporates Sharia into its legal system, Volokh says.

Gay Schoolteacher's Case Could Test Civil Rights Act Protection

Submitted by Amaris Elliott-Engel on Mon, 11/03/2014 - 09:03

Here's a piece I wrote for the Connecticut Law Tribune regarding a gay schoolteacher's discrimination lawsuit:

A former Hartford elementary school teacher alleges she was forced to quit her job after school administrators mistreated her when they found out she was married to a woman. The case could test the scope of protection provided by the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 in claims of discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Lisa Boutillier, a Colchester resident, alleges that her bosses at the Noah Webster MicroSociety Magnet Elementary School in Hartford violated Connecticut state law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation, medical condition and physical disability. She also alleges the school district violated the Civil Rights Act and the federal American with Disabilities Act.

Boutillier's spouse is unnamed in court papers and also works in the Hartford public school system.

The Hartford Public Schools district argues that the Civil Rights Act does not protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation and only applies to bias based on race, color, religion or national origin. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit "has stated definitively that sexual orientation is not a protected category" under the Civil Rights Act, the school district further argued.

But the plaintiff's counsel, Margaret Doherty of Doherty Law Group in Wethersfield, noted that interpretation of the law is starting to change.

"The Equal Employment and Opportunities Commission has found that claims brought by lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals alleging 'sex stereotyping' state a sex discrimination claim under Title VII" of the Civil Rights Act, Doherty argued in court papers.

Neither Doherty nor the magnet school's counsel, Hartford Assistant Corporation Counsel Melinda Kaufmann, returned calls seeking comment.

A federal judge recently gave the first round of the skirmish to the plaintiff, rejecting a defense motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

"Plaintiff has stated that the discriminatory conduct commenced after certain individuals became aware of her sexual orientation and that she was subjected to sexual stereotyping during her employment on the basis of her sexual orientation," Senior U.S. District Judge Warren Eginton stated. "Construed most broadly, she has set forth a plausible claim she was discriminated against based on her nonconforming gender behavior."

The judge also upheld the Boutillier's state law claim for constructive discharge based on her argument that she had to resign because her treatment by her employer was intolerable.

Contentious Meeting

Boutillier worked for Hartford Public Schools for seven years. When she started at the magnet school in 2006, Delores Cole was the principal.

Boutillier alleges that after Cole learned that Boutillier is gay, Cole began berating her and criticizing her in front of students, parents and other staff members. When Vernice Duke became assistant principal in September 2008, Boutillier alleges Duke also began berating her in front of others.

Boutillier said that in August 2011 she was treated for a pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lung) and underwent a hysterectomy. She went on medical leave until January 2012. Upon returning to school, she was reassigned as a floating "workshop/reading" teacher for the first and second grades. She also alleges that the classroom to which she was assigned was not set up for her and her need for assistance in moving heavy items was not accommodated.

In May 2012, Boutillier claims she had a contentious meeting with Duke and Cole during which they denounced her for the disruption caused by her medical absence and for not keeping them informed of when she might return.

Boutillier claims her physicians provided proper notice to school officials. After the meeting, Boutillier claims she became ill and distraught and had to go to the hospital.

"Plaintiff [went] on medical leave from her teaching duties and undergoing medical treatment for physical and mental ailments directly related to plaintiffs' intolerable working conditions," Boutillier's complaint said.

During her second leave of absence, Boutillier states that she was told that her medical insurance would be canceled. She claims there are district policies allowing employees to keep health benefits while on medical leave. The school district, however, disputes there are any such polices.

Boutillier says her work performance was exemplary.

"Throughout her seven years of employment with Hartford Public School District, Ms. Boutillier has performed her job responsibilities in a highly professional, effective and competent manner," the lawsuit said. "At no time during her employment with the defendant was Ms. Boutillier's job performance ever an issue."

Boutillier filed internal complaints against both administrators. School officials, in their court papers, said they found insufficient evidence that Cole or Duke had discriminated or retaliated against Boutillier.

Boutillier planned to return to teach in August 2013, but she says she quit because her new assignment would have brought her under Duke's direct supervision. She then filed complaints with the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Both agencies have released jurisdiction over Boutillier's complaints to the federal courts.

Boutillier is seeking reinstatement to her job, damages to compensate for lost wages and benefits, and damages for pain and suffering and emotional distress. She also claims she is entitled to punitive damages.

AP Report: Restrictions On #Ferguson Airspace Aimed at Media

In an exclusive report, the Associated Press' Jack Gillum and Joan Lowy report that public safety was the ostensible reason for restricting the airspace above Ferguson, Missouri, during large protests following the shooting of a young black man by a white police officer. But the AP, through an Freedom of Information Act request, has exposed recordings in which govermental officials acknowledged the purpose was to keep news helicopters away from the street protests. The recordings "raise serious questions about whether police were trying to suppress aerial images of the demonstrations and the police response by violating the constitutional rights of journalists with tacit assistance by federal officials," the AP further reports.

Patent Suits Eroding as Business Model

Bloomberg's Susan Decker had an interesting piece this week: firms that aggressively pursue patent litigation have found their business model to be less lucrative after the U.S. Supreme Court limited what types of software are eligible for legal protection and after the Patent and Trademark Office changed how it reviews patent disputes. Total patent lawsuits declined 23 percent in the third quarter of the year, Bloomberg reports. Adam Mossoff, a law professor at George Mason University said the changes show that Congress doesn't need to take up patent reform in 2015.

Oracle Asks to Legislators to Defund Lawsuit Over Health Insurance Website

Oracle Corp. has asked legislative leaders to defund a lawsuit Oregon has brought over the failed health insurance website the company built for the state, the Associated Press reports. Oracle contends that the insurance portal Cover Oregon failed because of mismanagement by the state. The state is suing Oracle for false claims and other causes of action, while Oracle has sued for state for breach of contract and alleged violations of its copyrights, the AP further reports.

Judge Rejects Full Ebola Quarantine For Nurse

Kaci Hickox, who is back in her home state of Maine after treating Ebola patients in West Africa, won a court victory in her home state against having her movements curtailed, The Washington Post reports. A judge ruled she "should continue daily monitoring and coordinate any travel with public-health officials," the Post further reports. When Hickox was forcibly quarantined by New Jersey after treating Ebola patients, claimed she was deprived of her liberty in violation of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.

Bar Association Investigates Hauntings at Courthouse

The Washington Post's Annie Gowen reports that employees at a courthouse in India think there are ghosts haunting their judicial complex: "Books have disappeared, strange noises have been heard. Computers and lights have seemed to switch on by themselves." The local bar installed closed-circuit television cameras to investigate the strange occurrences. One lawyer reported hearing loud knocking and seeing a "padlock swinging wildly back and forth, seemingly on its own."

Topic(s):

Pages

Subscribe to Cultivated Compendium RSS