You are here

law firm

Law Firm's Libel Lawsuit Shows Peril of Legal Blogging

Submitted by Amaris Elliott-Engel on Sun, 02/23/2014 - 11:36

An excerpt of a piece I wrote for the Connecticut Law Tribune: 

A libel lawsuit being prosecuted by a Connecticut law firm against a California-based legal practice is showing some of the perils of using legal blogs.

Karl D. Shehu, whose Shehu LLC law firm is based in Waterbury, filed a lawsuit alleging defamation by San Diego-based attorney William Adams, of Norton Moore & Adams.

One key ruling so far in the case has been that the Connecticut attorney having a blog and the California lawyer having a blog is not enough to maintain a cause of action under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA). Another key ruling is that it is insufficient to maintain a CUTPA cause of action if the attorneys are in competition to have their websites appear at the top of search engine results.

According to court papers, Adams sent two emails to Shehu LLC and two officials at the Connecticut Bar Association, Alice Bruno and Bill Chapman, alleging that Shehu spammed his blog, commented on an article with mass-produced, irrelevant remarks, and otherwise "'used a dishonest ruse.'" The subject line allegedly read: "'Your Spam is a professional ethics violation.'" Adams further alleged, according to court papers, that the conduct was unethical and violated American Bar Association professional responsibility rules.

In Shehu's lawsuit, the Connecticut attorney alleges Adams made the comments knowing they were false and with the intention of causing harm to Shehu's reputation and career as an attorney.

In a third email, Adams allegedly contacted the bar association officials again and stated he had no evidence that anyone at the Shehu law firm had personal knowledge of the comments, and he concluded that the comments were "'part of an internet marketing campaign by Shehu LLC.'"

 

National Law Firm Wilson Elser Aims to Duplicate Albany Lobbying Success in Hartford

Submitted by Amaris Elliott-Engel on Mon, 01/13/2014 - 11:20

I wrote a piece for the Connecticut Law Tribune about Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker looking to duplicate its lobbying success in New York's capital in Connecticut. The firm has opened a new office in Hartford, the second one in Connecticut. An excerpt of the piece:

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker is looking to duplicate the lobbying success it's had at New York's capital at Connecticut's seat of government, firm leaders said. In early January, the national law firm announced the opening of a new office in Hartford that will focus in part on governmental relations.

Wilson Elser "has the most successful lobbying firm in Albany," said David A. Rose, the partner responsible for forming the law firm's governmental relations practice in Connecticut. According to the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics, Wilson Elser has more than 160 lobbying clients in Albany.

As for the goals in Connecticut, Rose noted that Wilson Elser does not have a "niche lobbying practice" like some other firms.

"We're a law firm," Rose said. "As long as we can ensure there's not a conflict with any existing clients we're hopeful to work with as many and varied" lobbying clients as Wilson Elser does in Albany.

Rose has been involved in governmental affairs for 21 years either as a governmental lawyer or lobbyist. He worked as senior counsel for two Connecticut House speakers: Democrats Moira Lyons and James Amann. In 2007, he went to work as assistant counsel for then-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and stayed on through the tenure of Gov. David Patterson and then through the transition of Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

While there are a lot of similarities between Hartford and Albany, Rose said that "Connecticut has a much more transparent government" that is easier to access as a lobbyist or as a regular citizen. Unlike in Albany, anyone can walk into the Capitol building in Hartford without having to pass through metal detectors, he said.

If you spend enough time in the building, you will run into state leaders just by virtue of using the common elevators and corridors, Rose said.
"You have to be at the Capitol," Rose said, to have the opportunity to meet with top lawmakers, including the happenstance meetings in which elevator speeches for clients can be rolled out. There's nothing that beats the in-person interaction to "tell your client's story," Rose said.

Women Still Lagging At Large Law Firms

While women have made some progress in the partner ranks at large law firms, women are lagging at the associate level, The Washington Post reported earlier this week: "Women make up 20.2 percent of partners at major law firms — up from 19.9 percent in 2012 — but the percentage of women associates dipped slightly from 45.1 to 44.8 percent over the same period, according to a report released this month by the National Association for Law Placement, the District-based group that tracks diversity and career advancement issues in the legal industry. It is the fourth year in a row that the ratio of women associates has dropped since it reached a high of 45.7 percent in 2009."

Objections to Gay Lawyer's Defamation Claim Overruled

The Legal Intelligencer (my journalism alma mater) reports that a Philadelphia judge has overruled preliminary objections to a defamation lawsuit brought by a plaintiffs attorney against a firm that withdrew a job offer to him. The plaintif alleges Raynes McCarty withdrew its job offer to him based on false information it allegedly received from Anapol Schwartz after he had voiced concerns to that firm's leadership over what he believed to be discrimination based on his sexual orientation, The Legal reports.

Subscribe to RSS - law firm